Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Open Educational Resources (OERs)

Evaluation Criteria

For faculty evaluating OERs for use in their subject areas, below are some common guidelines for reviewing the quality of materials.
 

Content

  • Relevance and appropriateness of material to curriculum and course objectives, as well as to learning level of your students 
  • Accuracy of factual and technical information
  • Clarity of language 
  • Vetting by other peer reviewers
  • Availability of interactive tools and other supplemental resources
     

Production and Format

  • Layout of content ensures readability
  • Content is free of typos and formatting errors
  • Digital interface is easy to navigate
  • Audio and video playback is high quality and easy to operate
     

Accessibility

  • Digital text/web pages are compatible with screen readers
  • Images have alt text when not otherwise described
  • Audiovisual materials have captioning and transcriptions available

 

Licensing

  • Resource can be presented and distributed to students without additional permissions or fees
  • Resource can be modified to into course schedules and/or specific curriculum goals

See: Accessibility Georgia - Evaluating Resources
See: BCCampus OpenEd - Evaluating OER

Provider Criteria

OER providers have their own set of criteria for including content on their platforms: